Start Here: The Great House Farm Dispute
Quick Summary
This site documents the BP Properties Ltd v Buckler [1987] case — a dispute over Great House Farm (Ty Mawr), Llandough, where the Williams-Buckler family's 321-year occupation was terminated through a contested legal process involving alleged identity fraud, missing title deeds, and the demolition of an 800-year-old farmhouse.
What Happened
The Williams family acquired Great House Farm in 1667 and occupied it continuously for over three centuries. In 1974, BP sent unilateral "Licence to Occupy" letters addressed to "Mrs Buckler" — a name Mary Williams never used. This licence was later used by the courts to defeat the family's adverse possession claim. In 1987, the Court of Appeal granted BP possession. In 1988, Great House Farm was demolished by BP Properties Ltd amid considerable local controversy.
Why It Matters
- Ownership was never determined — Courts ruled on possession without ever adjudicating who actually owned the land
- Identity substitution — Mary Williams was referred to as "Mrs Buckler" in legal documents despite never adopting that name
- Missing evidence — Title deeds were reportedly removed from Cardiff Library in 1984
- Archaeological suppression — A Roman soldier discovery in 1870 was ignored; the 1994 excavation later found over 800 burials
- Judicial contradiction — The court said BP companies were "different" and "same" depending on which argument helped BP
What Evidence Exists
E004 — BP Licence Letters (1974)
BP sends "Licence to Occupy" addressed to "Mrs Buckler" — identity fraud alleged
E007 — Court of Appeal Judgment (1987)
BP Properties Ltd v Buckler [1987] EWCA Civ 2 — the basis of eviction
E008 — HER Record GGAT02038s
Official record confirms demolition by BP Properties Ltd on 6 Dec 1988
E001 — 1667 Acquisition
Williams family acquires Great House Farm from the Herberts
What Questions Remain
- Who actually owned Great House Farm in 1987?
- Where are the original title deeds removed from Cardiff Library in 1984?
- Why did the court avoid determining ownership?
- Was the "Mrs Buckler" identity substitution deliberate fraud?
- Why was the 1916 tenancy agreement never produced?
- What role did Frederick Buckler's secret dealings play?
- Why was Cadw's emergency listing process stalled?
Explore the Site
Case Summary
Overview of the dispute, key parties, dates, and evidence
Master Timeline
Chronological events from 1100 to present day
Evidence Catalogue
All documents with IDs, descriptions, and transcriptions
Claim-to-Evidence Mapping
Five key issues with supporting evidence and open questions
Contradictions Index
Documented contradictions in the legal case
Open Questions
Unresolved questions with known and unknown facts
Research Dossier
Complete printable dossier for download/PDF
Estimated reparations claim (Feb 2026): £101.2 million and counting.